The case talked over in PLJ 1997 SC 985 included a declaration that respondents, remaining co-sharers, were entrepreneurs of your land. The fit was initially dismissed, but on attraction, it absolutely was decreed in favor of your respondents. The court docket rectified the non-suiting in the plaintiff by the demo https://milomkyxz.blogolize.com/getting-my-covenants-and-land-use-restrictions-advocate-in-karachi-near-me-to-work-70364530